Nepal's ruling class never stops talking about empowering the people. Not only now, but since yesterday, the rulers have been talking about giving rights to the people. Even during the reign of the Rana ruler Shri 3, the constitutional law of the government of Nepal made in 2004 also spoke of giving rights to the people. And, that is also in the current law.
His Majesty's government at the time also expressed a strong desire to bring the country up to par with the progress of a progressive nation. He also mentioned in the preamble of the constitution that Nepal should be compared to the leading nations of the world through social, economic, political, and all other reforms. But no one was fatter than the ruler.
The movement of 2007 took place after the regime became very autocratic. The democratic movement involving the king and the people replaced the rule of His Majesty the King, and the beginning of a democratic system of governance was announced under the leadership of His Majesty the King, which promulgated the Interim Government of Nepal, 2007.
It was a great achievement in itself that the king mentioned in the preamble that the people should be empowered and the constitution should be made by the people. But the leading class of the movement did not institutionalize the achievements. For the same reason, the proclamation of the then King Tribhuvan expressing his desire and determination that there should be a democratic constitution made by the self-elected Legislative Council mentioned in the interim constitution issued after the joint democratic movement of the king/people was not implemented. Instead, every decade since then has been spent on who should take the reins and how to rule. Neither the Council of Ministers formed by the King implemented the issue of the Constituent Assembly, nor did it inform the people.
In the seven decades since the advent of democracy, the Nepali people have heard of the great plans of the rulers. Poverty continued to descend, dreaming of fulfillment in those plans for change
The king was blamed by the ruling class for covering up his black face, and the issue of the country's development could be developed if he was removed from power. As a result, on 26 April 1946, then King Birendra announced that he had handed over the executive power to the people.
Then began the work of enshrining the rights of the Nepali people in the constitution. "Keeping in mind the fact that the people are the source of state power in an independent and sovereign Nepal, we have from time to time expressed our determination to run a pro-people governance system. Motivated by the objective of achieving economic justice, by ensuring the basic human rights of every Nepali citizen, maintaining brotherhood and unity among the Nepali people based on freedom and equality, adult suffrage, parliamentary system of government, To strengthen the constitutional monarchy and multi-party democracy and to realize the concept of the rule of law by providing an independent and capable justice system, it is necessary to declare and implement this constitution made with the wide participation of the Nepali people. Then the Nepali people thought, now there will be food, shelter, and cotton.
Multi-party came. Happiness was celebrated. Multi-party reached the villages. Multi-party released Miteri. The brothers were flooded. Nepali Janata Party cadres were transformed. There was no policy on how to increase the number of cadres in the villages and take the reins into one's own hands. The state could not do anything for the people.
How could the state machinery not engage in any business other than feeding its cadres? Due to this, the armed Maoist movement against the regime that started in 1952 BS spread like wildfire.
A peace agreement was reached between the then government and the Maoists. After that, the movement of 2006/07 uprooted the 238-year-old monarchy in Nepal and declared a republic. Within ten years of the beginning of the Maoist armed movement with the poor, the working class, and the proletariat, it came to power as the largest party in the country. After coming to power, the common people thought that the spirit of the armed revolution would be contained. But on the contrary, the form of Maoist power could not be different from that of the previous rulers. Political incompetence escalated to the point that the Constituent Assembly had to be elected twice and only then the Constituent Assembly announced the promulgation of the Constitution of Nepal in 1972 BS.
Political parties have made Nepalis party workers, not people. The ruling class does nothing for itself and sees others as anti-development. We changed the system of governance but we could not change the attitude of the ruler
The Constitution of Nepal, 2072 begins with the phrase 'we are the sovereign Nepali people' mentioned in the preamble of the constitution of Nepal.
In the first paragraph, Nepal's independence, sovereignty, geographical integrity, national unity, independence, and self-respect, while preserving the people's sovereign rights, autonomy, and the right to self-government, ... '
It has been seven decades since the end of the Jahaniya Rana rule and the so-called democracy for the people. In these seven decades, the Nepali people got to hear the great plans of the ruler. Poverty continued to descend, dreaming of fulfillment in those plans for change. Why has the living standard of the Nepali people not risen when the Jahaniya Rana regime, the Panchayat system with executive powers of the king, multi-party system, and now the republic? Why did the movements carried out by the sacrifices of the Nepali people only change the face of the ruler? Why the rule of the people could not be established by changing the thinking, system, and method of the ruler? Was the movement just to change the face of some people in the regime? Or was the condition of the masses for change?
Those who came to power by giving martyrdom by demanding change in the system of governance by the Nepali people have been making the prosperous country of Nepal more and more destitute since yesterday. What is the fault of the Nepali people in Nepal's upheaval? Why don't the rulers/administrators want to take the people to a world beyond their dreams? Fertile land full of immense gifts of nature, Nepal can not be poor? Due to the poor thinking of the rulers here, Nepalis are living in the mentality of being poor. How can a country that did not look at Tibet yesterday and did not bow its head to anyone even when India was dependent on it be weak? Why is a country that is already a member of the United Nations and can provide assistance to a prosperous country like Korea now lagging behind its neighbor India in the current power struggle? There is a need to think about this.
